|
Last Updated
|
| Why do donor-funded tourism
projects in developing countries go belly-up so often? Frequently
it's because sufficient ownership has not been taken by the relevant
stakeholders. |
| So, why is ownership necessary?
Any tourism project needs a great deal of support to succeed.
At the very least it needs to have the enthusiastic support
of its main local stakeholders -- management, staff and families,
local community members, local businesses, local and national
tourist boards and, just as importantly, the global tourism
community.
Tourism is as emotional as it is practical. It is simply not
sufficient to come up with a tourism project that is technically
perfect to ensure its success. This is where multinational tourism
providers such as hotel groups score.
Effective leisure businesses do not need ownership from their
staff. They train it into them -- carrot and stick method. They
don't need ownership from external stakeholders, their brand
has already delivered that and carved its niche in the marketplace.
Plus, they know that, to succeed, management must take responsibility
for their project's profit, they have a simple task, making
money is relatively easy.
Donor-funded tourism projects are different, of course. They
understandably require more than money as return for their soft
loans and technical assistance, often donors also require modern
western development issues to be taken into consideration like
empowerment of women and disempowered minorities, transparency,
capacity-building and a series of other outputs.
Furthermore the documentation required from a donor-funded
project is often bureaucratic to say the least. And, when the
donors withdraw, the project still needs to be profitable to
be sustainable.
Clearly, the appropriate way to guarantee that a project performs
to its utmost possibilities is to carefully create and sustain
ownership by the relevant stakeholders.
We start with a problem, of course. Many donor-funded tourism
projects are located in less developed countries with a less
developed understanding of a more developed concept like "Ownership".
In less "Democratic" situations, frequently "Persuasion
to participate" takes on a stronger and more forceful tone
a million miles away from a free choice to "Own" a
project.
Donor-funded tourism development can be a very effective method
of utilising a global industry to augment a country's income-stream.
The tourism industry generated can employ people and provide
much-needed income. But, how can it provide equal partnerships
when one of the players is providing the funding and the expertise?
This must be particularly true in the many new destinations
that have little previous tourism experience.
So, who's money is silently dominating the conversations? The
donors. Who's creating the partnerships? Often the consultants,
employed by the donors who provide the technical assistance.
Who owns the language of development? The donors. Who needs
the money? The people who will benefit if they take ownership.
The fact is that destinations often need the jobs, they often
need the economic revenues too. Donors often provide all the
funding and the technical assistance to make the project work.
Competition for donor-funding is fierce, the acquisition of
a project not only offers opportunities for growth, but is also
a source of pride. It's easy to believe that people will often
make themselves look like they support a project even if they
understand little about it, even if they believe it will fail.
So, how to gain ownership? Here's a suggestion for a process
that may work.
|
|
|
1. Initial Ownership of project
I think that it needs to be made very clear from the outset
whose idea the project is and who has been involved in sponsoring
it.
-- Has the idea come from a local community member or group?
-- Is the project to be created as a result of a local or national
tourist board initiative?
-- Is the embryo project the result of a partnership between
a consultant and a local NGO?
-- What consultative processes have already taken place, who
was involved and what were their views?
2. Training and participation
It is clear that ideas and attitudes expressed by development
agencies, other NGO's and the global tourism industry are not
necessarily shared or understood by the local people who have
to make projects work even though they have no choice but to
accept them if the project takes place.
Before anything happens, I think that it is of fundamental importance
for a period of potential participant tourism training to be
provided. This could be fulfilled on site, but, most importantly,
an element of training-by-working should take place in the industry
off-site in a developed tourism area and, where possible in
commercial tourism companies.
This component could be a major output in itself and could lead
to potential further tourism development.
3. Identification of needs
All stakeholders need to be LISTENED to. Local business people.
local mothers and fathers, local government, local politicians,
local gossips, local media and global potential customers all
need to be consulted so that their needs are understood and
so that ongoing discussions may take place and that their ownership
of the project gained and augmented. It is commonly believed
that tourism is marketed simply through commercial channels.
This is simply not true, the locals not only have a great deal
to do in creating the product -- they frequently market it too,
through word of mouth.
4. Core Group Visualisation
For a healthy development to take place it needs to be be perceived
successful and fulfilling. Electing a core group that they may
visualise the successful project and promote it in the neighbourhood
amongst their peers provides not only ownership but fuller and
deeper understanding.
5. Initial Project Terms of Reference
The initial TOR's really need to be produced by the project
core group and presented to the wider group of stakeholders,
then, maybe to a funding or technical assistance agency.
I think that the above process implementation would deliver
the transparency and understanding necessary for a wide ownership.
At the very least it would provide a tourist-industry basic
education and the building blocks that are needed for future
development.
|
AUTHOR
Valere
Tjolle is recognised as an innovator, authority and key
proponent of direct and alternative marketing and product creation
in the travel and tourism industry. He has more than 40 years
in-depth, practical "Hands-on" experience. Projects
since 1995 have included tourism developments in Africa, USA,
UK and Eastern Europe. Valere is currently writing “You
Lucky People”, a witty and incisive history of the package-tour
business. Valere blogs online http://www.totemtourism.blogspot.com.
|
SEMINARS
Learning never ends. See if one of our seminars
is right for you. |
|
|
|
|